The Ethics of Publishing Biomedical and Natural Products Research

J Nat Prod. 2023 Sep 22;86(9):2228-2237. doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.3c00165. Epub 2023 Aug 28.

Abstract

Given that the essence of Science is a search for the truth, one might expect that those identifying as scientists would be conscientious and observant of the demands this places on them. However, that expectation is not fulfilled universally as, not too surprisingly, egregious examples of unethical behavior appear and are driven by money, personal ambition, performance pressure, and other incentives. The reproducibility-, fact-, and truth-oriented modus operandi of Science has come to face a variety of challenges. Organized into 11 cases, this article outlines examples of compromised integrity from borderline to blatant unethical behavior that disgrace our profession unnecessarily. Considering technological developments in neural networks/artificial intelligence, a host of factors are identified as impacting Good Ethical Practices. The goal is manifold: to raise awareness and offer perspectives for refocusing on Science and true scientific evidence; to trigger discussion and developments that strengthen ethical behavior; to foster the recognition of the beauty, simplicity, and rewarding nature of scientific integrity; and to highlight the originality of intelligence.

Keywords: Good Ethical Practices; dishonesty; ethics; honesty; integrity; reproducibility.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Biological Products*
  • Neural Networks, Computer
  • Publishing
  • Reproducibility of Results

Substances

  • Biological Products