Free and Charitable Clinic Telehealth Adoption and Utilization During the COVID-19 Era: The North Carolina Experience

Julie Ann Sakowski; Ashley Parks; Danielle Nunnery; Andrew Wear

doi:10.1089/tmr.2023.0029

Free and Charitable Clinic Telehealth Adoption and Utilization During the COVID-19 Era: The North Carolina Experience

Telemed Rep. 2023 Aug 3;4(1):215-226. doi: 10.1089/tmr.2023.0029. eCollection 2023.

Authors

Julie Ann Sakowski¹, Ashley Parks¹, Danielle Nunnery¹, Andrew Wear²

Affiliations

¹ Department of Nutrition and Healthcare Management, Beaver College of Health Sciences, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina, USA.
² Cratis D. Williams School of Graduate Studies, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina, USA.

Abstract

Purpose: The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic led health care systems and providers worldwide to rapidly adopt telehealth solutions to minimize risk and comply with isolation mandates. This article explores telehealth utilization trends in North Carolina (NC) free and charitable clinics-an ambulatory health care delivery setting where traditional third-party reimbursement policies are not a primary consideration.

Methods: We surveyed NC free and charitable clinic administrators regarding clinic decisions to adopt an externally sponsored telehealth system, what services are provided by telehealth, clinic implementation processes, which populations used telehealth, how telehealth was incorporated into current clinic workflows, and perceptions of telehealth outcomes.

Findings: Telehealth was rapidly adopted among free and charitable clinics after the COVID-19 outbreak. Reasons for implementing telehealth included the ability to continue providing services during a public health emergency and to increase access to patients. However, clinics report that telehealth utilization has dropped significantly since the initial pandemic surge. Patient and provider preferences for in-person services are a common reason cited for this drop. Free and charitable clinics report a strong interest in continuing to deliver services through telehealth. The majority reported continuing to offer telehealth services, but primarily as a supplement to in-person visits rather than as a replacement. They perceive that implementing telehealth has increased access to care but are less certain about the impact on cost of care and patient satisfaction. However, clinic administrators believe improvements in interoperability with other data systems, workflows, scheduling, and care delivery approaches are needed to achieve telehealth's fullest utilization.

Conclusion: Telehealth can play a significant role in expanding access to services in the free and charitable clinic setting. However, continued refinements in the technology to facilitate integration with other systems and workflow processes are needed to reach its full potential.

Keywords: free clinics; implementation; medically uninsured; telehealth; telemedicine; underserved populations.