Performance and patients' satisfaction with the A7+TouchCare insulin patch pump system: A randomized controlled non-inferiority study

PLoS One. 2023 Aug 24;18(8):e0289684. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289684. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Background: We assessed the performance and patient satisfaction of a new insulin patch pump, the A7+TouchCare (Medtrum), compared with the Omnipod system.

Methods: This multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled study enrolled 100 adult patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus (A1C ≥ 6.5% and ≤ 9.5%, i.e., 48 to 80 mmol/mol) who were assigned with the Omnipod or with the A7+TouchCare pump for 3 months. The primary study outcome was the glucose management indicator (GMI) calculated with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM).

Results: Premature withdrawals occurs respectively in 2 and 9 participants in the Omnipod and TouchCare groups. In the Per Protocol analysis, the difference in GMI between groups was 0.002% (95% confidence interval -0.251; 0.255). The non-inferiority was demonstrated since the difference between treatments did not overlap the pre-defined non-inferiority margin (0.4%). There was no significant difference in CGM parameters between groups. On average, patients in both groups were satisfied/very satisfied with the insulin pump system. Patients preferred Omnipod as an insulin management system and especially the patch delivery system but preferred the A7+TouchCare personal diabetes manager to control the system.

Conclusions: This study showed that the A7+TouchCare insulin pump was as efficient as the Omnipod pump in terms of performance and satisfaction.

Clinical trail registration: The study was registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov protocol register (NCT04223973).

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Multicenter Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Blood Glucose
  • Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2* / drug therapy
  • Humans
  • Insulins*
  • Patient Satisfaction

Substances

  • Blood Glucose
  • Insulins

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT04223973

Grants and funding

Medtrum Technologies Inc. Shanghai supported this study. The funder had no role in the study design, data collection, and analysis. AP (principal investigator) takes full responsibility for the work, including the decision to submit and publish the manuscript. The findings and conclusions in this study are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the sponsor's views.