Procalcitonin (PCT) is an important biomarker for bacterial infection with a high negative predictive value. It is almost always positive in patients who are bacteremic with pathogenic bacteria. Here, we report two cases of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, where PCT levels were unexpectedly negative. This uncommon occurrence challenges the assumption of PCT's infallibility as a diagnostic marker in patients with true bacteremia. The first case is a 55-year-old woman with no past medical issues who presented with one week of generalized weakness and two days of fever and chills. Though her white blood cell (WBC) count and c-reactive protein (CRP) were elevated, PCT was normal, with no apparent source of infection, and hence antibiotic differed. However, her blood cultures returned positive for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The patient was started on vancomycin and discharged on daptomycin, she responded appropriately and improved. The second case is an intravenous (IV) drug user, a 40-year-old woman, who presented with septic arthritis and osteomyelitis involving the right hip. She had blood cultures positive for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA); however, a PCT check on the day of positive blood cultures and various occasions subsequently was normal. These two cases remind us that we cannot over-rely on one test to rule out bacterial infection and should consider the whole clinical picture. They highlight the need for vigilance among clinicians that PCT can rarely be negative in cases of true bacteremia in spite of its high negative predictive value. Physicians and antibiotic stewardship programs should be cautious and aware of this potential pitfall when utilizing PCT as a diagnostic tool.
Keywords: bacteremia; false-negative procalcitonin; mrsa; mssa; pct; procalcitonin; staphylococcus aureus.
Copyright © 2023, Kommu et al.