Background: Recent advances in CFTR modulator therapy have the potential to change the face of cystic fibrosis (CF). This retrospective observational study describes real world experience of the four available CFTR modulators in adults and children with CF in a single centre in Melbourne, Australia.
Method: Data were collected for all patients treated with CFTR modulators at MonashCF between May 2012 and September 2020. Primary outcomes included lung function, admission days and BMI/BMI centile over time. Adverse events and reasons for changing or ceasing medications were also analysed.
Results: 55% (74/133) adult and 46% (55/119) paediatric patients were treated with CFTR modulators. FEV1 increased in adults treated with ivacaftor (IVA) and elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) by 4.73% and 10.07% respectively, and BMI also improved in these groups. Nutrition improved in adults and children treated with lumacaftor/ivacaftor (LUM/IVA). There was no significant improvement in FEV1 or admission days with LUM/IVA or tezacaftor/ivacaftor (TEZ/IVA). 36% (31/85) ceased LUM/IVA, due to adverse effects in 81% (25/31). Of these, 92% (23/25) changed to TEZ/IVA, 78% (18/23) without significant adverse effects.
Conclusions: Our findings for LUM/IVA and TEZ/IVA are less encouraging than those seen in clinical trials, with no significant improvement in lung function or admission days and a higher rate of adverse effects with LUM/IVA compared with phase 3 clinical trials. TEZ/IVA was generally well tolerated by those who experienced side effects with LUM/IVA. The small number of patients treated with ELX/TEZ/IVA had improvements in all parameters. These findings support ongoing use of IVA for individuals with gating mutations, and transition to ELX/TEZ/IVA once available for patients with at least one Phe508del mutation.
Keywords: Adverse effects; CFTR modulators; Cystic fibrosis; Lung function; Nutrition.
Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.