Alcohol and smoking brief interventions by socioeconomic position: a population-based, cross-sectional study in Great Britain

Vera Helen Buss; Sharon Cox; Graham Moore; Colin Angus; Lion Shahab; Linda Bauld; Jamie Brown

doi:10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0087

Alcohol and smoking brief interventions by socioeconomic position: a population-based, cross-sectional study in Great Britain

BJGP Open. 2023 Dec 19;7(4):BJGPO.2023.0087. doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0087. Print 2023 Dec.

Authors

Vera Helen Buss^{1

2}, Sharon Cox^{3

2}, Graham Moore^{2

4}, Colin Angus^{2

5}, Lion Shahab^{3

2}, Linda Bauld^{2

6}, Jamie Brown^{3

2}

Affiliations

¹ Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK v.buss@ucl.ac.uk.
² SPECTRUM Research Consortium, Edinburgh, UK.
³ Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.
⁴ DECIPHer, School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
⁵ Sheffield Alcohol Research Group, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
⁶ Usher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

PMID: 37549977
DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0087

Abstract

Background: Alcohol and smoking brief interventions (BIs) in general practice have been shown to be effective in lowering alcohol and smoking-related harm.

Aim: To assess prevalence of self-reported BI receipt among increasing or higher-risk drinkers and past-year smokers in England, Scotland, and Wales, and associations between intervention receipt and socioeconomic position.

Design & setting: Cross-sectional study using data from a monthly population-based survey in England, Scotland, and Wales.

Method: The study comprised 47 799 participants (15 573 increasing or higher-risk drinkers [alcohol use disorders identification test consumption score ≥5] and 7791 past-year smokers) surveyed via telephone in 2020-2022 (during the COVID-19 pandemic). All data were self-reported. Prevalence of self-reported BI receipt was assessed descriptively; associations between receipt and socioeconomic position were analysed using logistic regression.

Results: Among adults in England, Scotland, and Wales, 32.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 31.8 to 32.7) reported increasing or higher-risk drinking and 17.7% (95% CI = 17.3 to 18.1) past-year smoking. Among increasing or higher-risk drinkers, 58.0% (95% CI = 57.1 to 58.9) consulted with a GP in the past year, and of these, 4.1% (95% CI = 3.6 to 4.6) reported receiving BIs. Among past-year smokers, 55.8% (95% CI = 54.5 to 57.1) attended general practice in the past year; of these, 41.0% (95% CI = 39.4 to 42.7) stated receiving BIs. There was a tendency for patients from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds to receive more alcohol (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.38, 95% CI = 1.10 to 1.73) or smoking BIs (aOR 1.11, 95% CI = 0.98 to 1.26), but for the latter the results were statistically non-significant. Results did not differ notably by nation within Great Britain.

Conclusion: BIs in general practice are more common for smoking than for alcohol. A greater proportion of BIs for alcohol were found to be delivered to people who were from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds and who were increasing or higher-risk drinkers.

Keywords: cross-sectional studies; drinking behaviour; general practice; smoking; socioeconomic position; substance intervention.