Introduction: The purpose of this study was to determine if there is a relationship between socioeconomic disadvantage and student progression in an accelerated, three-year, doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) program.
Methods: The percentage of socioeconomically disadvantaged students in Larkin University's applicant and accepted pool was compared to national data using an N-1 Chi-square. The on-time graduation rate for three classes of PharmD students were compared based on the economic or environmental disadvantage questions posed by Pharmacy College Application Service (PharmCAS). On-time graduation rates were also analyzed by sex, race/ethnicity, and geographical area using a Pearson's Chi-square. Student academic admissions profiles were compared by race/ethnicity using analysis of variance.
Results: Larkin University had a higher percentage of applicants and accepted candidates from certain underrepresented groups. There was no significant difference in on-time graduation for students who answered yes to any of the economic or environmental disadvantage questions as opposed to those who answered no, nor was there a significant difference in on-time graduation by sex or geographical area. For race, there was a significantly lower rate of on-time graduation for students who were Black or African American, even though their admissions criteria were comparable to that of students of other races.
Conclusions: Students who had an economic or environmental disadvantage graduated on-time at the same rate as students who did not have such disadvantages. Black or African American students had lower on-time rates than other ethnic groups, but the reason for lower on-time graduation was unclear.
Keywords: Admissions; Disadvantaged students; On-time graduation; Socioeconomical disadvantage; Three-year pharmacy program.
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.