Neurotechnology and ethics guidelines for human enhancement: The case of the hippocampal cognitive prosthesis

Artif Organs. 2023 Aug;47(8):1235-1241. doi: 10.1111/aor.14615. Epub 2023 Aug 2.

Abstract

Neurotechnologies offer both therapeutic and enhancement potential. In this article, we demonstrate how ethics guidelines can help with critical reflection on their potential for enhancement. We do this through the case of the hippocampal cognitive prosthesis. This prothesis developed in the US, has primarily therapeutic ends, with scope for enhancement. This technology raises several ethical issues, including as related to identity and memory, autonomy and authenticity. In the first section, we outline what we mean by enhancement, and introduce neurotechnologies generally and the hippocampal cognitive prosthesis specifically, with an introduction to generally relevant ethical issues. In the second section, we outline ethical issues pertinent to the hippocampal cognitive prosthesis and explore how ethics guidelines can help to promote essential critical reflection on a technology like this. Through all this, our emphasis is to balance between technological optimism and caution, especially where technologies have enhancement potential.

Keywords: augmentation; cognitive prosthesis; ethics; human enhancement; identity; memory; neurotechnology.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Artificial Limbs*
  • Cognition
  • Humans
  • Prosthesis Implantation*