Donor safety of remnant liver volumes of less than 30% in living donor liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Clin Transplant. 2023 Sep;37(9):e15080. doi: 10.1111/ctr.15080. Epub 2023 Aug 2.

Abstract

Purpose: This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the acceptability of donor remnant liver volume (RLV) to total liver volume (TLV) ratio (RLV/TLV) being <30% as safe in living donor liver transplantations (LDLTs).

Methods: Online databases were searched from January 2000 to June 2022. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed- or random-effects model.

Results: One prospective and seven retrospective studies comprising 1935 patients (164 RLV/TLV <30% vs. 1771 RLV/TLV ≥30%) were included. Overall (OR = 1.82; 95% CI [1.24, 2.67]; p = .002) and minor (OR = 1.88; 95% CI [1.23, 2.88]; p = .004) morbidities were significantly lower in the RLV/TLV ≥30% group than in the RLV/TLV <30% group (OR = 1.82; 95% CI [1.24, 2.67]; p = .002). No significant differences were noted in the major morbidity, biliary complications, and hepatic dysfunction. Peak levels of bilirubin (SMD = .50; 95% CI [.07, .93]; p = .02) and international normalized ratio (SMD = .68; 95% CI [.04, 1.32]; p = .04) were significantly lower in the RLV/TLV ≥ 30% group than in the RLV/TLV <30% group. No significant differences were noted in the peak alanine transferase and aspartate transaminase levels and hospital stay.

Conclusions: Considering the safety of the donor as the top priority, the eligibility of a potential liver donor in LDLT whose RLV/TLV is expected to be <30% should not be accepted.

Keywords: donor safety; living donor; living donor liver transplantation; morbidity; remnant volume.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Systematic Review
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Hepatectomy
  • Humans
  • Liver
  • Liver Transplantation*
  • Living Donors
  • Prospective Studies
  • Retrospective Studies