Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Values Obtained with Disposable Tip and Conventional Applanation Prism in the Population without Clinical Signs of Glaucoma

Pedro Henrique Alves Soares; Rafael de Oliveira Santos; Celso Ribeiro Angelo De Menezes Filho; Sebastião Pimenta Moraes Neto; João Antonio Prata Junior

doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1401

Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Values Obtained with Disposable Tip and Conventional Applanation Prism in the Population without Clinical Signs of Glaucoma

J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2023 Apr-Jun;17(2):75-78. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1401.

Authors

Pedro Henrique Alves Soares¹, Rafael de Oliveira Santos¹, Celso Ribeiro Angelo De Menezes Filho¹, Sebastião Pimenta Moraes Neto¹, João Antonio Prata Junior¹

Affiliation

¹ Department of Ophthalmology, Health Science Institute, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Abstract

Aim: Comparing intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements using Goldmann applanation prism and TonoSafe® in the population without signs of glaucoma.

Material and methods: Patients with no ocular pathologies, except ametropia (until ± 4 D) or IOP of <30 mm Hg without signs of glaucoma by optic disc structural analysis by fundus biomicroscopy. The IOP was measured sequentially using the traditional cone and the TonoSafe®, according to a randomization list to determine which device would be used first. The measurements from the right and left eyes were compared separately. Since there was no statistical difference, both eyes were considered in this study.

Results: A total of 385 eyes of 194 patients with a mean age of 66.4 ± 11.2 years old were included. The mean IOP with conventional prism was 14.2 ± 3.6 and 14.3 ± 3.6 mm Hg with TonoSafe^®. Differences were not statistically significant by the Wilcoxon test (p = 0.3). The median was 14.0 mm Hg for both groups. The mean difference between measurements was 0.04 mm Hg, with the median equal to zero. There was no statistical difference in IOP readings according to which device was the first measurement.

Conclusion: No statistical difference was found in IOP was measured with conventional prism or TonoSafe® in the population without signs of glaucoma.

Clinical significance: The data provided by our study support the efficacy and safety of the disposable tonometer compared to the Goldman tonometer in measuring IOP in patients without glaucoma.

How to cite this article: Soares PHA, Santos RDO, Filho CRADM, et al. Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Values Obtained with Disposable Tip and Conventional Applanation Prism in the Population without Clinical Signs of Glaucoma. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2023;17(2):75-78.

Keywords: Cross-sectional studies; Disposable tip; Intraocular pressure; Tonometry.