Mini-Sternotomy Versus Conventional Sternotomy In Aortic Valve Replacement Surgery; A Comparative Study

J Pak Med Assoc. 2023 Apr;73(Suppl 4)(4):S56-S60. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.EGY-S4-13.

Abstract

Objectives: To assess safety; efficacy and efficiency of mini-sternotomy in aortic valve replacement in comparison to conventional sternotomy on short term follow up.

Method: This comparative study between 45 patients having aortic valve replacement via fullsternotomy versus 45 others planned for upper j-shaped mini-sternotomy, was conducted from May 2019 to February 2022 in Kafrelsheikh university hospital, Egypt. Data was collected and statistically analysed to assess outcomes.

Results: Mini-Sternotomy approach was compared to conventional approach on the aspects of cardio pulmonary bypass (CPB) (p=0.153) and cross clamp (CC) time (p=0.673),. There was significantly less postoperative bleeding (p<0.001), rate of blood transfusion (p<0.001), duration of ICU stay (p=0.013) and total hospitalstay (p=0.022) in ministernotomy approach in comparison to conventional sternotomy.

Conclusions: For primary isolated AVR, lessinvasive techniques are a realistic, practical, and good alternative that offers better postoperative results than Full Sternotomy.

Keywords: Aortic valve, sternotomy, Blood Transfusion, Pain, Intensive Care Units..

MeSH terms

  • Aortic Valve* / surgery
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation* / methods
  • Humans
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures / methods
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sternotomy / methods
  • Treatment Outcome