Radiopacity evaluation of calcium silicate cements

BMC Oral Health. 2023 Jul 15;23(1):491. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03182-w.

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the radiopacity of calcium silicate cements using a digital imaging method.

Methods: Four calcium silicate cements, NeoMTA 2, OrthoMTA, ProRoot MTA, and Biodentine, were used in this study. Disk-shaped samples were prepared from each material and placed on a plexiglass plate. An aluminum step-wedge was placed alongside the samples on a digital sensor and exposed to 70 kVp and 8 mA from 30 cm away for 0.32 s. The greyness values ​​of the tested materials were measured digitally with the system software and compared with those of the step-wedge to determine the equivalent aluminum thickness.

Results: The radiopacity values, expressed in equivalent millimetres of aluminum, of the studied materials ProRoot MTA, OrthoMTA, NeoMTA 2, and Biodentine were 4.32 ± 0.17 mm Al, 3.92 ± 0.09 mm Al, 3.83 ± 0.07 mm Al, and 2.29 ± 0.21 mm Al, respectively. Statistically significant differences were found between the mean radiographic density values of the tested materials (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: ProRoot MTA was the most radiopaque root canal filling material among the tested materials. All materials, except Biodentine, were found to be compliant with the minimum radiopacity requirements of ISO 6876 and ADA 57 standards.

Keywords: Biodentine; Calcium silicate cements; NeoMTA 2; OrthoMTA; ProRoot MTA; Radiopacity.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aluminum Compounds
  • Aluminum*
  • Calcium Compounds
  • Drug Combinations
  • Humans
  • Materials Testing
  • Oxides
  • Root Canal Filling Materials*
  • Silicates

Substances

  • tricalcium silicate
  • calcium silicate
  • Aluminum
  • Calcium Compounds
  • Oxides
  • Silicates
  • Root Canal Filling Materials
  • Aluminum Compounds
  • Drug Combinations