Test-Retest Reliability and Responsiveness of the Computerized Adaptive Testing System of the Functional Assessment of Stroke

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Oct;104(10):1676-1682. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.06.017. Epub 2023 Jul 5.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the test-retest reliability, responsiveness, and clinical utility of the Computerized Adaptive Testing System of the Functional Assessment of Stroke (CAT-FAS) in persons with stroke.

Design: Repeated measurements design.

Setting: A department of rehabilitation in a medical center.

Participants: 30 persons with chronic stroke (for test-retest reliability) and 65 persons with subacute stroke (for responsiveness) were recruited. To examine the test-retest reliability, the participants received measurements twice at 1-month intervals. To examine the responsiveness, the data were collected at admission and discharge from hospital.

Interventions: Not applicable.

Main outcome measurement tool: CAT-FAS.

Results: The intra-class correlation coefficients of the CAT-FAS were ≥0.82, indicating good to excellent test-retest reliability. The Kazis' effect size and standardized response mean of the CAT-FAS were ≥0.96, indicating good group-level responsiveness. For individual-level responsiveness, approximately two-thirds of the participants exceeded the conditional minimal detectable change. On average, the CAT-FAS was completed within 9 items and 3 minutes per administration.

Conclusions: Our results suggest the CAT-FAS is an efficient measurement tool with good to excellent test-retest reliability and responsiveness. In addition, the CAT-FAS can be used routinely in clinical settings to monitor progress of the crucial 4 domains for persons with stroke.

Keywords: Clinical utility; Computerized adaptive testing system; Rehabilitation; Responsiveness; Stroke; Test-retest reliability.