Introduction: Chronic prostatitis (CP) is one of the most important and discussed urological diseases. Treatment of bacterial CP with an established pathogen usually is not associated with any difficulties. Chronic abacterial prostatitis (CAP) remains the most problematic issue. Immune defense mechanisms are important in the development of CP, including a decrease in the functional activity of monocytes/ macrophages, neutrophils, as well as imbalance of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines.
Aim: To evaluate the efficiency of various schemes of using the immunomodulatory drug Superlymph as part of the combination therapy of men with CAP.
Materials and methods: A total of 90 patients with category IIIa CAP (NIH, 1995) were included in the study. In the control group, patients received basic therapy of CAP, namely behavioral therapy, 1-adrenoblocker and fluoroquinolone for 28 days. In the main group I basic therapy in combination with Superlymph 25 ME in one suppository q.d. for 20 days was administered. In the main group II basic therapy in combination with Superlymph 10 ME in one suppository b.i.d. for 20 days was given. Evaluation of treatment efficiency was carried out after 14 +/- 2 days (visit 2) and 28+/- 2 days (visit 3) from the start of treatment.
Results: The study groups were homogeneous, and baseline characteristics did not differ significantly (p>0.05). However, significant differences were found between the results in the main groups and the control group at visit 2 for all the indicators (p<0.05). The number of daytime urinations was lower in the main group I and II compared to CG by 16.7% and 28.4%, the number of night urination by 28% and 40%, the average IPSS score by 29.1% and 38.3%, the average QoL score by 32.4% and 45.9%, the average NIH-CPSI score by 26.8% and 37.4%, the number of leukocytes in expressed prostatic secretion by 41.2% and 52.1%, prostate volume by 16.8% and 21.8%, bladder volume by 15.8% and 21.7%, and Qmax by 14.3% and 21.2%, respectively. Similar significant differences between the main groups and control group were also seen at visit 3, while the indicators in main groups I and II reached normal values after 28 days of therapy. In this study, for the first time, a comparative analysis of two different treatment regimens with Superlymph was carried out. In the main group I, patients received suppositories at a dose of 25ME q.d., while in the main group II, the drug was administered 10 ME b.i.d. The results indicate a comparable efficiency of both schemes after 4 weeks. However, in the main group II, after 2 weeks, there was a significantly more pronounced positive dynamics of all indicators in comparison with the main group I (p<0.05). Consequently, the use of Superlymph at a dose of 10ME b.i.d. a day allows to reduce the severity of the inflammatory process in a shorter time.
Conclusion: The use of Superlymph in patients with CAP allows to reduce the severity of clinical manifestations in a shorter time, and has a positive effect on the dynamics of the inflammatory process, which leads to an improvement in the quality of life. According to our results, the most effective scheme in patients with CAP is basic therapy in combination with Superlymph 10 ME for 1 suppository 2 times a day for 10 days. In our opinion, Superlymph can be effectively used as part of the combination therapy of men with CAP.
Keywords: Chronic abacterial prostatitis; Superlymph; cytokine therapy; immunomodulating preparations; natural cytokine complex.