What the COVID pandemic taught us about the management of pediatric minor trauma

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a change in our practice in the management of pediatric soft-tissue injuries. Patients were managed conservatively whenever possible. Our aim in this study was to see whether this more conservative approach adversely affected clinical, and patient-reported outcomes, including scarring. A prospective record of children presenting to the plastic surgery "Early Bird" clinic for pediatric trauma between 01.04.2020 and 30.06.2020 was kept. Electronic patient records were reviewed. An outpatient telephone clinic was scheduled for all patients. Parents were asked about complications and what they thought about the scar and to rate it as either: "poor," "satisfactory," "good," or "excellent." There were 240 patients, including 136 (57%) males and 104 (43%) females. The most frequent type of injury was a facial laceration in 123 patients (51.3%), followed by hand lacerations in 43 (17.9%), fingertip injuries in 31 (12.9%), and others. Ninety out of 240 (37.5%) were offered surgery. Follow-up times ranged from 17 to 20 months. Most parents (86.2%) were happy with the scarring and reported it as "good" or "excellent." The proportion rating the scar "excellent" or "good" was similar in the non-operated cohort (i.e., 85.5%) versus the operated cohort (88.5%) (p-value 0.16). The overall complication rate of patients seen during this time was 5.9%; 7.4% in the conservatively managed and 4.9% of those who went to the theater. Despite managing more wounds, including some dog bites, conservatively, patients and parents reported low complication rates and high levels of satisfaction with the final scarring.

Keywords: Animal bites; Minor trauma; Nailbed injuries; Pediatric trauma.