This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic capability of isolated-check visual evoked potential (icVEP) for primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) via comparison with visual field (VF) tests and pattern visual evoked potential (PVEP). This cross-sectional study enrolled 68 subjects, including 33 POAG patients and 35 controls. All subjects underwent a complete ophthalmic examination, including icVEP, PVEP, and VF tests. The diagnostic performance, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), the integrated discrimination index (IDI), and the net reclassification index (NRI) were calculated. The clinical benefits of the three tests were compared via decision curve analysis (DCA) of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) from icVEP, the P100 latency and amplitude of 1° and 0.25° checks from the PVEP, pattern standard deviation (PSD), and mean deviation (MD) from the VF test. The SNR, MD and PSD, PVEP P100 latency of 0.25° checks, and P100 amplitude (both 1° and 0.25° checks) showed significant differences between the POAG and control groups (* p < 0.05), except for the P100 latency of 1° checks. Regarding diagnostic ability, the three tests, AUC, IDI, and NRI, showed no significant difference (p > 0.05). The DCA showed that the clinical benefits of icVEP (SNR) were comparable to those of VF (MD and PSD) and better than those of PVEP (P100 latency and amplitude). In addition, no significant difference was found in the consistency analysis of the qualitative comparison between the icVEP, VF, and PVEP (McNemar p > 0.05). In this study, icVEP showed a diagnostic ability for early to moderate POAG patients comparable to VF and PVEP. IcVEP might be applied as a supplementary psychophysical examination method in addition to VF examinations for special POAG populations who have difficulty cooperating with the VF examination.
Keywords: diagnosis; glaucoma; isolated-check; open angle; visual evoked potential.