Impact of telescopic intramedullary rodding on the growth of tibia: Comparative experimental study in dogs

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2023 Jun 24:103645. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103645. Online ahead of print.

Abstract

Introduction: The most commonly accepted method of long bone deformity correction in children with osteogenesis imperfecta is surgical realignment with transphyseal telescopic intramedullary rodding. This approach ensures reinforcement of the bone throughout the growth period. Although longitudinal growth does occur with these implants there has been very little work carried out to calculate the effect of such factors as rod position or implant material on growth. We carried out a prospective comparative study on 12 puppies using titanium alloy telescopic tibial rods with and without hydroxyl-apatite coating. The aim of this non-randomized controlled experimental study was to assess the impact of telescopic intramedullary rodding on spontaneous growth of the tibia.

Material and methods: Twelve mongrel puppies aged of 5 months underwent intramedullary transphyseal rodding of the right tibia. In group I (6 dogs) a titanium telescopic rod was used, in group II (6 dogs) a titanium rod with hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated threaded end was used. The following radiological criteria were assessed before surgery and every month until age of 12 months (natural fusion of physes in dogs): length of tibia, amount of superposition of inner (male) rod into external (female) rod; alteration of anatomy in terms of joint angles (mMPTA, mLDTA, mPPTA, mADTA); positioning of threaded ends in proximal and distal epiphyses and evidence of premature growth arrest. Parameters were compared with left tibia serving as control segment. The null hypothesis was that neither rod position nor implant material altered growth.

Results: The transphyseal rods did not lead to irreversible epiphysiodesis in either group. In group II (HA-coated) some loss of residual length was found in all six dogs, over 7mm (5.9%) in comparison to left intact tibia. In contrast to that, in group I (titanium nail) only one animal (16.7%) demonstrated a tibia length discrepancy of 8mm (4.8%). Eccentric ( posterior) positioning of the rod in the distal epiphysis resulted in a procurvatum deformity (increased anterior distal tibial angle) in both groups. We found no failure of telescoping and no loss of fixation of threaded parts in either epiphyses.

Discussion: The presence of telescopic rods with HA-coated threads parts clearly contributes to inhibition of spontaneous longitudinal growth. We hypothesize that HA stimulates maturation of chondrocytes of growth plate. Our findings regarding the potential adverse effect of thread position in the distal physis demonstrate the importance of attempting to place the rod as central as possible.

Conclusion: Titanium alloy telescopic rods did not reveal significant effect on physeal growth in puppies in comparison to HA-coated implants. Transphyseal HA-coated implants did however inhibit growth plate function with mean loss of length of 5.2% compared to the other side. Eccentric positioning of rods relative to center of physis resulted in angular deformity due to irregular growth. There were no cases of mechanical failure or loss of telescopic function with either group of titanium implant.

Level of evidence: II; prospective comparative experimental study.

Keywords: Bone growth; Epiphysiodesis; Osteogenesis imperfecta; Telescopic rodding; Titanium.