Research publications of Australia's natural history museums, 1981-2020: Enduring relevance in a changing world

Tayla A Green; Pat A Hutchings; Fiona R Scarff; James R Tweedley; Michael C Calver

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0287659

Research publications of Australia's natural history museums, 1981-2020: Enduring relevance in a changing world

PLoS One. 2023 Jun 23;18(6):e0287659. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287659. eCollection 2023.

Authors

Tayla A Green¹, Pat A Hutchings^{2

3}, Fiona R Scarff¹, James R Tweedley¹, Michael C Calver¹

Affiliations

¹ Environmental and Conservation Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.
² Australian Museum Research Institute, Australian Museum, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
³ Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia.

Abstract

As a case study of the responses of natural history museums to changing scientific and funding environments, we analysed research publications of Australia's Natural History Museums (ANHMs) 1981-2020. Using Scopus, 9,923 relevant documents 1981-2020 were identified, mainly research papers but with a growing proportion of reviews. The number of documents published increased over tenfold from 39 (1981) to 553 (2020), likely driven by collaborations (rising from 28.5% of documents 1981-1985 to 87.2% of documents 2016-2020), contributions from retired staff, and volunteer support. The mean length of documents (pages) ranged from a low of 15.3 in 2001-2005 to a high of 17.4 in 1991-1995, but this statistically significant result was trivial in practical terms. The sources (i.e., journals, book titles, conference proceedings) in which ANHM authors published changed over time, with growing proportions of publications in journals covering molecular ecology/phylogenetics and biological conservation. We identified the major areas of study canvassed within the corpus of publications by developing structural topic models based on patterns of word use in document titles, abstracts and keyword lists. The topics discovered included study subjects traditional for natural history museums (new taxa, phylogeny, systematics, animal morphology, palaeontology, minerals), new directions (molecular genetics, ecology, biological conservation) and marine biology (probably reflecting Australia's large coastline). Most citations came from Australia, USA and UK, although in 2016-2020 only 27.9% of citing documents included an Australian author. Growth in numbers of documents and collaborations, as well as use of documents internationally over a period of great change in scientific and funding environments, indicate an enduring legacy of ANHM research, grounded on the intrinsic value of the collections.

Copyright: © 2023 Green et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Publication types

Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

Animals
Australia
Bibliometrics
Ecology*
Museums*
Publications

Grants and funding

Michael C Calver and Patricia A Hutchings received financial support from the Australian Museum, Sydney https://australian.museum, numbered Murdoch University IRMA Grant#20238. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.