[Effectiveness of mepolizumab in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma: In a real life study]

Tuberk Toraks. 2023 Jun;71(2):148-155. doi: 10.5578/tt.20239918.
[Article in Turkish]

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Effectiveness of mepolizumab in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma: In a real life study

Introduction: We analyzed the effects of mepolizumab treatment on symptoms, asthma attacks, pulmonary function test parameters peripheral blood eosinophil level, and percentage in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma receiving mepolizumab treatment as the baseline, sixth and twelfthmonth data.

Materials and Methods: The medical records of patients diagnosed with severe eosinophilic asthma and treated with mepolizumab at our clinic were retrospectively reviewed for the period between January 2018 and December 2021. Demographic data of the patients, duration of asthma disease, comorbidities such as a nasal polyp, eosinophilic granulomatous polyangiitis, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug exacerbated respiratory disease were investigated. A comparison was made of various factors before initiating mepolizumab treatment, as well as at the sixth and twelfth month after treatment initiation. These factors include asthma control test scores, frequency of asthma attacks (including emergency admissions, hospitalizations, and intensive care admissions), peripheral blood eosinophil levels and percentages, and pulmonary function test parameters. Clinic and laboratory parameters that provide a prediction of being a responder and super responder were evaluated.

Results: A total of 21 patients were included in the study. Their mean age was 50.7 ± 11.9 years, and four (19%) were males. The mean duration of asthma diagnosis was 17.5 ±13.7 years. 14 patients (66.7%) were atopic. 4 patients (19%) had nasal polyps and four patients (19%) had NERD. Before mepolizumab, 13 (61.9%) patients had received omalizumab. The duration of receiving mepolizumab treatment was 29.2 ± 9.9 months. A statistically significant dec rease was observed in both the number and percentage of eosinophils at months six and 12 (p< 0.01). There was a statistically significant increase in FEV1 values both as a percentage and in milliliters at month 12. There was an increase in both percentage and milliliters in FEF25-75 values, but this increase did not reach statistical significance. There was a decrease in service admissions, intensive care admissions, and emergency admissions due to asthma exacerbations. Out of 21 patients, 11 (52.4%) were classified as responders, while 10 (47.6%) were classified as super responders.

Conclusion: Although the number of patients in our study was limited, mepolizumab improved symptom scores in severe eosinophilic asthma, reduced the number of attacks, and improved pulmonary function test values.

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Anti-Asthmatic Agents* / therapeutic use
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized / therapeutic use
  • Asthma* / diagnosis
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Nasal Polyps*
  • Pulmonary Eosinophilia* / chemically induced
  • Pulmonary Eosinophilia* / drug therapy
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • mepolizumab
  • Anti-Asthmatic Agents
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized