Value of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Through-the-Needle Biopsy in Pancreatic Cystic Lesions. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

J Gastrointest Cancer. 2024 Mar;55(1):15-25. doi: 10.1007/s12029-023-00949-w. Epub 2023 Jun 21.

Abstract

Background and aim: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided through-the-needle biopsy (EUS-TTNB) has been used over the past few years to increase diagnostic accuracy for pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs). However, many concerns remain regarding its widespread use. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to pool the data from high-quality studies to evaluate the utility of EUS-TTNB in diagnosing PCLs.

Methods: Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) from January 2010 through October 2022 were searched for publications addressing the diagnostic performance of EUS-TTNB in the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions. Pooled proportions were calculated using fixed (inverse variance) and random-effects (DerSimonian-Laird) models.

Results: The initial search identified 635 studies, of which 35 relevant articles were reviewed. We extracted data from 11 studies that met the inclusion criterion, comprising a total of 575 patients. Mean patient age was 62.25 years ± 6.12 with females constituting 61.39% of the study population. Pooled sensitivity of EUS-TTNB in differentiating a PCL as neoplastic or non-neoplastic was 76.60% (95% CI = 72.60-80. 30). For the same indication, EUS TTNB had a pooled specificity of 98.90% (95% CI = 93.80-100.00). The positive likelihood ratio was 10.28 (95% CI = 4.77-22.15), and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.26 (95% CI = 0.22-0.31). The pooled diagnostic odds ratio for EUS-TTNB in diagnosing PCLs as malignant/pre-malignant vs. non-malignant was 41.34 (95% CI = 17.42-98.08). Pooled adverse event rates were 3.04% (95% CI = 1.83-4.54) for pancreatitis, 4.02% (95% CI = 2.61-5.72) for intra-cystic bleeding, 0.94% (95% CI = 0.33-1.86) for fever, and 1.73% (95% CI = 0.85-2.91) for other minor events.

Conclusions: EUS-TTNB has good sensitivity with excellent specificity in accurately classifying PCLs as neoplastic or non-neoplastic. Adding EUS-TTNB to EUS-FNA increases the accuracy of EUS-guided approach in diagnosing PCLs. However, it could significantly increase the risk of post-procedural pancreatitis.

Keywords: Cystic pancreatic lesion(s); EUS-TTNB; Endoscopic ultrasound; PCLs; Pancreatic cystic lesion(s); Through-the-needle biopsy.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration* / methods
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pancreatic Cyst* / diagnosis
  • Pancreatic Cyst* / diagnostic imaging
  • Pancreatic Cyst* / pathology
  • Pancreatic Neoplasms* / diagnosis
  • Pancreatic Neoplasms* / diagnostic imaging
  • Pancreatic Neoplasms* / pathology
  • Sensitivity and Specificity