The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the performance of implants placed with the All-on-4 technique after a mean time in function of 9 years. A total of 34 patients with 156 implants were selected for this study: 18 patients underwent tooth extraction on the day of implant placement (Group D), and 16 patients were already edentulous (Group E). A periapical radiograph was taken at a mean follow-up of 9 years (range: 5 to 14 years). Success and survival rates and the prevalence of peri-implantitis were calculated. Statistical analysis was used to assess comparisons between groups. After a mean follow-up of 9 years, the cumulative survival rate was 97.4% and the success rate was 77.4%. The difference between the initial and final radiographs resulted in a mean marginal bone loss (MBL) of 1.3 ± 1.06 mm (range: 0.1 to 5.3 mm). No differences were seen between Groups D and E. Peri-implantitis affected 15 implants (9.6%) in 9 patients (26.5%). This study shows that the All-on-4 technique is a reliable treatment method for both edentulous patients and patients requiring tooth extractions, with results maintained over a long follow-up period. The present MBL results are similar to those around implants in other rehabilitation types.