No increased prevalence of prosopagnosia in aphantasia: Visual recognition deficits are small and not restricted to faces

Perception. 2023 Sep;52(9):629-644. doi: 10.1177/03010066231180712. Epub 2023 Jun 15.

Abstract

Aphantasia and prosopagnosia are both rare conditions with impairments in visual cognition. While prosopagnosia refers to a face recognition deficit, aphantasics exhibit a lack of mental imagery. Current object recognition theories propose an interplay of perception and mental representations, making an association between recognition performance and visual imagery plausible. While the literature assumes a link between aphantasia and prosopagnosia, other impairments in aphantasia have been shown to be rather global. Therefore, we assumed that aphantasics do not solely exhibit impairments in face recognition but rather in general visual recognition performance, probably moderated by stimulus complexity. To test this hypothesis, 65 aphantasics were compared to 55 controls in a face recognition task, the Cambridge Face Memory Test, and a corresponding object recognition task, the Cambridge Car Memory Test. In both tasks, aphantasics performed worse than controls, indicating mild recognition deficits without face-specificity. Additional correlations between imagery vividness and performance in both tasks were found, suggesting that visual imagery influences visual recognition not only in imagery extremes. Stimulus complexity produced the expected moderation effect but only for the whole imagery-spectrum and only with face stimuli. Overall, the results imply that aphantasia is linked to a general but mild deficit in visual recognition.

Keywords: aphantasia; face recognition; object recognition; prosopagnosia; visual agnosia; visual imagery.

MeSH terms

  • Cognition
  • Humans
  • Pattern Recognition, Visual
  • Prevalence
  • Prosopagnosia*
  • Recognition, Psychology
  • Visual Perception