Association of Intradialytic Hypertension with Future Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in Hemodialysis Patients: Effects of Ambulatory Blood Pressure

Am J Nephrol. 2023;54(7-8):299-307. doi: 10.1159/000531477. Epub 2023 Jun 9.

Abstract

Introduction: Intradialytic hypertension (IDHTN) is associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes. Patients with IDHTN have higher 44-h blood pressure (BP) than patients without this condition. Whether the excess risk in these patients is due to the BP rise during dialysis per se or on elevated 44-h BP or other comorbid conditions is uncertain. This study evaluated the association of IDHTN with cardiovascular events and mortality and the influence of ambulatory BP and other cardiovascular risk factors on these associations.

Methods: 242 hemodialysis patients with valid 48-h ABPM (Mobil-O-Graph-NG) were followed for a median of 45.7 months. IDHTN was defined as: systolic BP (SBP) rise ≥10 mm Hg from pre- to post-dialysis and post-dialysis SBP ≥150 mm Hg. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality; the secondary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, resuscitation after cardiac arrest, heart failure hospitalization, coronary or peripheral revascularization.

Results: Cumulative freedom from both the primary and secondary endpoint was significantly lower for IDHTN patients (logrank-p = 0.048 and 0.022, respectively), corresponding to higher risks for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.566; 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.001, 2.450]) and the composite cardiovascular outcome (HR = 1.675; 95% CI [1.071, 2.620]) in these individuals. However, the observed associations lost statistical significance after adjustment for 44-h SBP (HR = 1.529; 95% CI [0.952, 2.457] and HR = 1.388; 95% CI [0.866, 2.225], respectively). In the final model after additional adjustment for 44-h SBP, interdialytic weight gain, age, history of coronary artery disease, heart failure, diabetes, and 44-h pulse wave velocity, the association of IDHTN with the outcomes was also not significant and the respective HRs were 1.377 (95% CI [0.836, 2.268]) and 1.451 (95% CI [0.891, 2.364]).

Conclusions: IDHTN patients had higher risk for mortality and cardiovascular outcomes but this risk is at least partly confounded by the elevated BP levels during the interdialytic period.

Keywords: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; Blood pressure; Cardiovascular outcomes; Hemodialysis; Intradialytic hypertension.

MeSH terms

  • Blood Pressure / physiology
  • Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory
  • Heart Failure* / complications
  • Humans
  • Hypertension* / complications
  • Hypertension* / epidemiology
  • Kidney Failure, Chronic* / complications
  • Kidney Failure, Chronic* / therapy
  • Pulse Wave Analysis
  • Renal Dialysis / adverse effects