Facilitators and Barriers to HPV Self-Sampling as a Cervical Cancer Screening Option among Women Living with HIV in Rural Uganda

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 May 30;20(11):6004. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20116004.

Abstract

Background: There is a paucity of studies exploring women living with HIV's (WLWH) experiences relating to human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling as cervical cancer (CC) screening approach, either at the clinic or at the home setting, using qualitative methods. Our study explored facilitators and barriers to HPV self-sampling as a CC screening approach among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected women, as supported by the new WHO guidelines of using the HPV test as a screening modality. Methods: The study was guided by the health promotion model (HPM), which helps individuals achieve higher levels of well-being. The phenomenology design was used to explore the deeper facilitators and barriers of women regarding self-sampling, either at home or in clinical settings, at Luweero District Hospital, Uganda. The in-depth interview (IDI) guide was translated from English to Luganda. Qualitative data analysis was guided by content analysis techniques. The transcripts were coded in NVivo 20.7.0. The coded text was used to generate categories of analytically meaningful data that guided the formation of themes, the interpretation of results, and the final write-up. Results: WLWH were motivated to screen for HPV using the clinic-based approach because of perceived early diagnosis and treatment, visualization of the cervix, and free service, while reduced distance, privacy and the smooth sample collection kit were motivators for the home-based approach. A barrier that cut across the two HPV self-sampling approaches was a lack of knowledge about HPV. The barriers to clinic-based HPV self-sampling screening included lack of privacy, perceived painful procedures for visual inception under acetic acid (VIA), and fear of finding the disease. Stigma and discrimination were reported as the major barriers to the home-based HPV self-sampling approach. The major reasons why some WLWH refused to screen were fear of finding the disease, stress, and financial disruptions related to being diagnosed with CC disease. Conclusions: Therefore, early diagnosis for HPV and CC enhances clinic-based HPV self-sampling, while privacy enhances the home-based HPV self-sampling approach. However, fear of finding a disease and the lack of knowledge of HPV and CC hinders HPV self-sampling. Finally, designing pre- and post-testing counselling programs in HIV care is likely to increase the demand for HPV self-sampling.

Keywords: HPV; HPV self-sampling; barriers; cervical cancer; clinic-based; facilitators; home-based; women living with HIV.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Early Detection of Cancer / methods
  • Female
  • HIV
  • HIV Infections* / diagnosis
  • Human Papillomavirus Viruses
  • Humans
  • Mass Screening / methods
  • Papillomaviridae
  • Papillomavirus Infections* / diagnosis
  • Uganda
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms* / prevention & control

Grants and funding

This work was funded by the HEARD PhD scholarship program (HEARD-2019).