Thermostable chaperone-based polypeptide biosynthesis: Enfuvirtide model product quality and protocol-related impurities

PLoS One. 2023 Jun 8;18(6):e0286752. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286752. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Large peptide biosynthesis is a valuable alternative to conventional chemical synthesis. Enfuvirtide, the largest therapeutic peptide used in HIV infection treatment, was synthesized in our thermostable chaperone-based peptide biosynthesis system and evaluated for peptide quality as well as the profile of process-related impurities. Host cell proteins (HCPs) and BrCN cleavage-modified peptides were evaluated by LC-MS in intermediate. Cleavage modifications during the reaction were assessed after LC-MS maps were aligned by simple in-house algorithm and formylation/oxidation levels were estimated. Circular dichroism spectra of the obtained enfuvirtide were compared to the those of the chemically- synthesized standard product. Final-product endotoxin and HCPs content were assessed resulting 1.06 EU/mg and 5.58 ppm respectively. Peptide therapeutic activity was measured using the MT-4 cells HIV infection-inhibition model. The biosynthetic peptide IC50 was 0.0453 μM while the standard one had 0.0180 μM. Non-acylated C-terminus was proposed as a cause of IC50 and CD spectra difference. Otherwise, the peptide has met all the requirements of the original chemically synthesized enfuvirtide in the cell-culture and in vivo experiments.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Enfuvirtide / pharmacology
  • HIV Envelope Protein gp41 / chemistry
  • HIV Fusion Inhibitors* / pharmacology
  • HIV Infections* / drug therapy
  • Humans
  • Peptide Fragments / chemistry
  • Peptides / chemistry

Substances

  • Enfuvirtide
  • Peptide Fragments
  • HIV Envelope Protein gp41
  • HIV Fusion Inhibitors
  • Peptides

Grants and funding

This study was partially funded by a grant from the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (agreement #075-15-2021-1071). Andrey Siniavin performed “in vitro activity” part of the study without specific funding.The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.