Implant Placement with Simultaneous Guided Bone Regeneration in the Anterior Region Close to the Periapical Lesion of Adjacent Teeth: A Combined Treatment Strategy to Prevent Complications

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2023;38(3):533-544b. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9839.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and performance of a potential novel strategy to resolve the above scenario by simultaneously performing implant-related surgery and endodontic microsurgery (EMS).

Materials and methods: A total of 25 subjects requiring GBR during implant placement in anterior areas were allocated into two groups. In the experimental group (adjacent teeth with periapical lesions) with 10 subjects, implantation and GBR were performed for edentulous areas with simultaneous EMS for adjacent teeth. In the control group (adjacent teeth without periapical lesions) with 15 subjects, implantation and GBR were performed for edentulous areas. The clinical outcomes, radiographic bone remodeling, and patient-reported outcomes were assessed.

Results: Within a 1-year follow-up, the implant survival rate was 100% in both groups, with no significant difference regarding complications. All teeth achieved complete healing following EMS. Repeated analysis of variance (ANOVA) measurements revealed a significant change over time in horizontal bone widths and postoperative patient-reported outcomes, but no intergroup statistically significant differences (P > .05) in horizontal bone widths and visual analog scale scores of pain, swelling, and bleeding were observed. Likewise, the bone volumetric decrease (7.4% ± 4.5% in the experimental group and 7.1% ± 5.2% in the control group) from T1 (suture removal) to T2 (6 months after implantation) revealed no intergroup differences. The horizontal bone width gain at the implant platform was slightly lower in the experimental group (P < .05). Interestingly, the color-coded figures of both groups showed a facial reduction of grafted material in edentulous areas. However, the apical regions following EMS exhibited stable bone remodeling in the experimental group.

Conclusion: This novel approach to address the problem involving implant-related surgery close to the periapical lesion of adjacent teeth appeared safe and reliable (no.: ChiCTR2000041153). Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2023;38:533-544. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9839.

MeSH terms

  • Bone Regeneration
  • Dental Implantation, Endosseous
  • Dental Implants* / adverse effects
  • Dental Implants, Single-Tooth*
  • Humans
  • Mouth, Edentulous*
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Wound Healing

Substances

  • Dental Implants