Where and how have written action plans for atopic eczema/dermatitis been developed and evaluated? Systematic review

Charankumal Singh Thandi; Sophie Constantinou; Rosie Vincent; Matthew J Ridd

doi:10.1002/ski2.213

Where and how have written action plans for atopic eczema/dermatitis been developed and evaluated? Systematic review

Skin Health Dis. 2023 Mar 22;3(3):e213. doi: 10.1002/ski2.213. eCollection 2023 Jun.

Authors

Charankumal Singh Thandi^{1

2}, Sophie Constantinou², Rosie Vincent², Matthew J Ridd¹

Affiliations

¹ Population Health Sciences Bristol Medical School University of Bristol Bristol UK.
² Department of Dermatology Bristol Royal Infirmary Bristol UK.

Abstract

Background: Atopic eczema/dermatitis is a common inflammatory condition which affects 15%-30% of children and 2%-10% of adults. It can have a significant impact and its management can be challenging. It is important for patients, parents, and caregivers to know how to look after their skin.

Objectives: To identify and review written eczema action plans (WAPs) that are available internationally for use by patients, parents, and caregivers.

Methods: We followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines. We searched relevant databases (MEDLINE, Embase, COCHRANE) from inception until March 2022. We sought grey literature via Google searches and professional networks. Database search results were independently reviewed by two different reviewers. With identified WAPs, we assessed length, appearance, content, how it was developed and whether it had been evaluated.

Results: From 312 abstracts, supplemented by other searches, we identified 20 unique eczema WAPs. From nine countries, all were written in English with 18 were designed for children. For the majority, it was unclear whether any development work preceded their creation or the intended clinical setting for use. Nineteen had a stepwise approach, 17 advised when to seek help, 6 were visually appealing and 6 had a rationale behind treatment documented in the WAP. Only three had been evaluated in clinical trials.

Conclusion: Further evaluation is needed to assess the effectiveness of the WAPs that currently exist, prior to creating further WAPs. Patient and caregiver involvement is needed in any future work.