Conservative and minimally invasive approaches to control idiopathic condylar resorption: a scoping review

J Valladares-Neto; G M R Acioli; A B Teodoro; K Evangelista; B D 'a Furquim; M A G Silva

doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2023.05.003

Conservative and minimally invasive approaches to control idiopathic condylar resorption: a scoping review

Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Nov;52(11):1188-1196. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2023.05.003. Epub 2023 Jun 2.

Authors

J Valladares-Neto¹, G M R Acioli², A B Teodoro², K Evangelista³, B D 'a Furquim⁴, M A G Silva⁵

Affiliations

¹ Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil. Electronic address: jvalladares@uol.com.br.
² Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
³ Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
⁴ Private practice, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil.
⁵ Department of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.

PMID: 37271625
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2023.05.003

Abstract

Idiopathic condylar resorption (ICR) is an uncommon disease with multiple names that challenges orthodontic and surgical treatments. The aim of this study was to investigate the existing conservative and minimally invasive approaches to controlling ICR. A scoping literature review was conducted. Inclusion criteria were young patients with degenerative joint disease based on the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders or Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) protocols, or ICR based on the DC/TMD expanded taxonomy protocol. Six electronic databases and the grey literature were searched, without restriction on year or language. Two reviewers independently performed the study selection and data extraction. Ten studies were selected from the 13,953 records identified. The total sample size was 424 patients; the female-to-male ratio was 7:1 and the mean age of the patients was 25.7 years. The main primary outcomes were pain, mandibular dysfunction, and condylar resorption. There is no guarantee of definitive success in the early management of ICR, despite the promising approaches studied, and there is no specific protocol to be followed. Therefore, close post-surgical follow-up is still required. This study highlights the need to standardize the nomenclature and diagnostic criteria, and assess the status of condylar activity/severity in future research.

Keywords: Bone resorption; Evidence-based practice; Orthognathic surgery; Osteoarthritis; Systematic review; Temporomandibular joint disorders.

Publication types

Review