Objects: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the modified Bass technique (MBT), the Rolling technique and the current brushing technique(CBT) for plaque removal and to assess the acceptability of the first two brushing techniques.
Methods: 180 participants were randomly assigned to PowerPoint-based training with a demonstration of either the MBT plus basic toothbrushing, the Rolling technique plus basic toothbrushing, or the basics of tooth brushing alone (CBT group). The participants were asked to brush their teeth based on what they had learned. The Turesky modification of the plaque index of Quigley & Hein (TQHI) and marginal plaque index (MPI) were assessed at the baseline examination and after 1, 2, and 4 weeks. Brushing sequence, brushing technique, and brushing duration were measured immediately after training and at each subsequent interview.
Results: After instruction (0 weeks), all groups showed a significant decrease in TQHI and MPI (p<0.001), followed by a gradual increase. There was no difference in the overall effect of plaque removal between the groups(p>0.05). MBT had a better effect on cervical plaque removal than the Rolling technique after 4 weeks (p<0.05). More participants in the Rolling group were able to fully master the brushing technique during the whole four weeks.
Conclusions: There was no difference in the overall plaque removal effect among the three groups. The MBT was most effective in removing plaque at the cervical margin but more difficult to master.
Clinical significance statement: This study was conducted to compare the teaching and plaque removal effects of two brushing techniques and to understand which method is better for plaque removal as well as adoption. This study provides a reference and basis for future clinical work and oral hygiene education.
Keywords: Clinical trial, Dental plaque control; Learning effect; Modified bass technique; Rolling technique.
Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.