Binary-valued outcome is often seen in many clinical trials across therapeutic areas. It is not uncommon that such binary endpoints are derived from a continuous variable. For example, in diabetes clinical trials, the proportion of patients with HbA1c< 7% is often investigated as one of the key objectives, where HbA1c is a continuous-valued variable reflecting the averaged blood glucose value from the previous three months. Most of the time, if not all, the mean of those binary endpoints were estimated directly through the binary variable defined by the corresponding cutoff. Alternatively, by the nature of the derivation, that quantity could also be estimated by leveraging the density of the underlying continuous variable and computing the area under the density curve up to a threshold. This paper provides a few methods in relation to density estimation. Extensive simulation studies were conducted based on real clinical trial data to compare these estimation approaches against the direct estimation of the proportions. Simulation results showed that the density estimation approaches in general benefited from a smaller mean squared error in early phase studies where the sample size is limited. The density estimation approach is certainly expected to introduce bias, however, a favorable bias-variance trade-off may make these approaches attractive in early phase studies.
Keywords: Bias-variance trade-off; Binary outcome; Density estimation; Dichotomization; Model averaging.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Drug Information Association, Inc.