Are Complementary Feeding Practices Aligned with Current Recommendations? A Narrative Review

Children (Basel). 2023 Apr 28;10(5):794. doi: 10.3390/children10050794.

Abstract

The complementary feeding introduction period (introduction of solid foods alongside breastmilk or formula) is defining in children's health; however, it appears that many parents do not follow complementary feeding guidelines. Our aim was to describe current parental feeding practices during complementary feeding in relation to current recommendations and explore determinants of adherence to guidelines. We included any relevant studies published within the last decade in French or English and summarized findings by recommendation category. The timing of complementary food introduction varied widely across and within continents (earlier in North America and often delayed in Asia). The introduction of allergenic foods tended to be delayed globally. Although some parents now begin complementary feeding with solid foods (i.e., baby-led weaning), delayed introduction of lumpy textures was still prevalent in the United States and in Europe. The consumption of iron-rich foods was predominantly low in Africa. Added sugars were globally introduced early, especially in America. Evidence for the prevalence of responsive feeding practices among parents is unclear due to the small number of studies. Determinants of complementary feeding practices included parental characteristics, such as age, education, socio-economic status, and race/ethnicity. Interventions aiming to increase adherence to complementary feeding guidelines must account for parental characteristics.

Keywords: baby-led weaning; complementary feeding; determinants; food choices; infancy; parental feeding practices; solid food; timing.

Publication types

  • Review

Grants and funding

This study received no external funding. A.N. is supported by a Canada Graduate Scholarships—Master’s program from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.