Differences in the Volatilomic Urinary Biosignature of Prostate Cancer Patients as a Feasibility Study for the Detection of Potential Biomarkers

Curr Oncol. 2023 May 10;30(5):4904-4921. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30050370.

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) continues to be the second most common malignant tumour and the main cause of oncological death in men. Investigating endogenous volatile organic metabolites (VOMs) produced by various metabolic pathways is emerging as a novel, effective, and non-invasive source of information to establish the volatilomic biosignature of PCa. In this study, headspace solid-phase microextraction combined with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME/GC-MS) was used to establish the urine volatilomic profile of PCa and identify VOMs that can discriminate between the two investigated groups. This non-invasive approach was applied to oncological patients (PCa group, n = 26) and cancer-free individuals (control group, n = 30), retrieving a total of 147 VOMs from various chemical families. This included terpenes, norisoprenoid, sesquiterpenes, phenolic, sulphur and furanic compounds, ketones, alcohols, esters, aldehydes, carboxylic acid, benzene and naphthalene derivatives, hydrocarbons, and heterocyclic hydrocarbons. The data matrix was subjected to multivariate analysis, namely partial least-squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA). Accordingly, this analysis showed that the group under study presented different volatomic profiles and suggested potential PCa biomarkers. Nevertheless, a larger cohort of samples is required to boost the predictability and accuracy of the statistical models developed.

Keywords: biomarkers; prostate cancer; urine; volatilomics.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Biomarkers
  • Feasibility Studies
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Neoplasms, Second Primary*
  • Prostatic Neoplasms*
  • Terpenes
  • Volatile Organic Compounds* / analysis

Substances

  • Volatile Organic Compounds
  • Biomarkers
  • Terpenes

Grants and funding

This work was supported by FCT-Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia through the CQM Base Fund-UIDB/00674/2020 and Programmatic Fund-UIDP/00674/2020; and by ARDITI-Agência Regional para o Desenvolvimento da Investigação Tecnologia e Inovação through the project M1420-01-0145-FEDER-000005-Centro de Química da Madeira-CQM+ (Madeira 14-20 Program). Giulia Riccio was supported by a PhD scholarship given by Univesità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy. Jorge A. M. Pereira was supported by a post-doctoral fellowship given by ARDITI (Project M1420-09-5369-FSE-000001), and Cristina V. Berenguer acknowledges Núcleo Regional da Madeira da Liga Portuguesa contra o Cancro (LPCC-NRM) and Bolsa Rubina Barros for their support with this project. The authors also acknowledge the financial support from Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia and Madeira 14-2020 program to the Portuguese Mass Spectrometry Network through the PROEQUIPRAM program M14-20 M1420-01-0145-FEDER-000008.