Objective: Type I (medialization) thyroplasty (MT), fat injection laryngoplasty (FIL), and arytenoid adduction (AA) are the 3 most common surgical treatments for unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP). While MT and FIL involve medialization of the paralyzed vocal fold, the goal of AA is to reduce the glottal-level difference. The current study compared the effects of these surgical treatments on voice quality in patients with UVFP. Methods: This retrospective study included 87 patients with UVFP who underwent MT (n = 12), FIL (n = 31), AA (n = 6), or AA with MT (n = 38). Patients who underwent the former 2 surgical treatments were included in the thyroplasty (TP) group, while those who underwent the latter 2 were included in the AA group. Maximum phonation time (MPT), pitch period perturbation quotient (PPQ), amplitude perturbation quotient, and harmonic-to-noise ratio (HNR) were evaluated in all patients before and 1 month after surgery. Results: The TP group exhibited significant improvements in MPT (P < .001) and PPQ (P = .012), while the AA group exhibited significant improvements in all parameters (P < .001). Before surgery, voice quality was significantly worse in the AA group than in the TP group for all measures. However, there were no significant differences between the groups after treatment. Conclusion: Surgeries in both groups were effective for voice recovery in patients with UVFP under the appropriate surgical selection. Our results also highlight the importance of preoperative evaluation and the potential value of etiology for selecting the appropriate procedure.
Keywords: arytenoid adduction; autologous fat injection laryngoplasty; etiology; medialization thyroplasty; type I thyroplasty; unilateral vocal fold paralysis.