Codeine prescription pattern and treatment responses in patients with chronic cough: a routinely collected institutional database analysis

Ji-Yoon Oh; Yu Ri Kang; Jin An; Eugene Choo; Ji-Hyang Lee; Hyouk-Soo Kwon; Jae-Seung Lee; Sei Won Lee; Tae-Bum Kim; Yeon-Mok Oh; You Sook Cho; Sang-Do Lee; Woo-Jung Song

doi:10.21037/jtd-22-1857

Codeine prescription pattern and treatment responses in patients with chronic cough: a routinely collected institutional database analysis

J Thorac Dis. 2023 Apr 28;15(4):2344-2354. doi: 10.21037/jtd-22-1857. Epub 2023 Apr 24.

Authors

Ji-Yoon Oh¹, Yu Ri Kang¹, Jin An², Eugene Choo³, Ji-Hyang Lee¹, Hyouk-Soo Kwon¹, Jae-Seung Lee⁴, Sei Won Lee⁴, Tae-Bum Kim¹, Yeon-Mok Oh⁴, You Sook Cho¹, Sang-Do Lee⁴, Woo-Jung Song¹

Affiliations

¹ Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
² Department of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.
³ Division of Allergy and Immunology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
⁴ Department of Pulmonology and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

Background: Codeine has been long used as an antitussive drug in several countries. However, a prescription pattern of codeine, such as dose or treatment duration, has not been reported in detail. Furthermore, there is few scientific evidence on the efficacy and safety. We aimed to examine codeine prescription pattern and explore treatment response in patients with chronic cough in real-world practice.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with chronic cough who were newly referred to tertiary allergy and asthma clinics between July 2017 and July 2018. Routinely collected electronic healthcare records (EHRs), including medical notes, prescriptions, and outpatient visits, were analyzed. Codeine prescription records were examined for duration, mean daily dose, and 1-year cumulative dose. Codeine responses were evaluated by manual EHR reviews.

Results: Among a total of 1,233 newly referred patients with chronic cough, 666 were prescribed codeine for a median [interquartile range (IQR)] of 27.5 days (IQR 14-60 days); the median daily dose was 30 mg/year (IQR 21.6-30 mg/year), and the 1-year cumulative dose was 720 mg/year (IQR 420-1,800 mg/year). About 14.0% of patients were prescribed codeine for >8 weeks; they were older and had a longer cough duration, throat abnormal sensation and less dyspnea than patients prescribed codeine for ≤8 weeks or who did not receive codeine. Codeine prescription and duration was positively associated with the number of other cough-related medications, diagnostic tests, or outpatient visits. Cough status change was noted in 61.3% of codeine-prescribed patients (as 'improved' in 40.1% and 'not improved' in 21.2%), but not documented in 38.7%. Side effects were described in 7.8%.

Conclusions: Codeine prescription may be frequent and chronic in real-world practice of patients with chronic cough, despite the lack of robust clinical evidence on the efficacy. High prescription rates suggest unmet clinical needs. Prospective studies are warranted to identify codeine treatment responses and safety, and to build up clinical evidence to guide appropriate use of narcotic antitussives.

Keywords: Codeine; antitussive; cough; real-world evidence; routinely collected data.