Real-world ramucirumab and immune checkpoint inhibitor sequences in US patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer

Future Oncol. 2023 Jun;19(18):1277-1291. doi: 10.2217/fon-2022-0604. Epub 2023 May 17.

Abstract

Aim: To describe real-world treatment sequences of ramucirumab relative to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer. Methods: Retrospective, observational study including adult patients treated with ramucirumab (April 2014-June 2020) from a nationwide health-record database. Results: In 1117 eligible patients, ramucirumab + paclitaxel was the most common ramucirumab-containing regimen (72.0%). A total of 217 patients also received an ICI. For ramucirumab then ICI (n = 148) and ICI then ramucirumab (n = 50), ramucirumab + taxane and ICI monotherapy were the most frequent approaches, most commonly observed as second- and third-line (2L and 3L). Median time on ramucirumab in 2L and 3L was similar regardless of sequence with ICI. Conclusion: Most patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer received ramucirumab before ICI, with ramucirumab + paclitaxel as the most common ramucirumab-based regimen.

Keywords: GEJ cancer; electronic medical records; esophageal cancer; gastric cancer; immune checkpoint inhibitor; line of therapy; ramucirumab; real-world evidence; treatment sequence.

Plain language summary

What is the Order of New Treatments for Gastroesophageal Cancers in the Real World? What is this summary about? Gastroesophageal cancers (cancers of the stomach or food pipe) which cannot be cured are first treated using traditional chemotherapy. Newer anti-cancer therapies with fewer side effects, such as ramucirumab (RAM) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), are now available either alone or in combination with chemotherapy. We designed this study to describe the order of use for RAM and ICI. What were the results? The patients in this study were from Flatiron Health database, which includes electronic medical record data of US patients with gastroesophageal cancers. The included patients had been treated with RAM and were grouped based on the treatments received and in the order in which they received RAM and ICI. Of the patients who received both RAM and ICI, RAM then ICI was the most common order, followed by ICI then RAM and then RAM plus ICI at the same time. RAM in combination with paclitaxel (a chemotherapy) was the most common RAM-containing treatment. The duration of RAM therapy was the same whether patients received the treatment before or after ICI. What do results of the study mean? These findings can be used by patients with gastroesophageal cancers and oncologists when making treatment decisions, specifically if RAM might be an option when it is time to change treatments. Real-world studies like this help answer questions that were not addressed in clinical trials.

Publication types

  • Observational Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / adverse effects
  • Esophageal Neoplasms* / drug therapy
  • Esophageal Neoplasms* / etiology
  • Humans
  • Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors / pharmacology
  • Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors / therapeutic use
  • Paclitaxel
  • Ramucirumab
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Stomach Neoplasms* / drug therapy
  • Stomach Neoplasms* / etiology

Substances

  • Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
  • Paclitaxel

Grants and funding