[Effectiveness analysis of "tail compression fixation+suture bridge" technology under shoulder arthroscopy for treating primary tear in medial enthesis of rotator cuff]

Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 May 15;37(5):561-565. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202302030.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of "tail compression fixation+suture bridge" technology under shoulder arthroscopy for treating primary tear in medial enthesis of rotator cuff.

Methods: The clinical data of 11 patients with primary tear in medial enthesis of rotator cuff who met the selection criteria between October 2020 and October 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, including 3 males and 8 females, aged 39-79 years, with an average of 61.0 years. Rotator cuff injury was caused by traumatic fall in 8 cases, and the time from injury to admission was 1-4 months, with an average of 2.0 months; the remaining 3 cases had no obvious inducement. The active range of motion of the affected shoulder was limited, with an active forward flexion range of motion of (64.1±10.9)°, abduction of (78.1±6.4)°, internal rotation of (48.2±6.6)°, and external rotation of (41.8±10.5)°; 5 cases had shoulder stiffness. The preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score was 7.8±0.8 and the American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score was 23.9±6.4. The patients were treated with "tail compression fixation+suture bridge" technology under shoulder arthroscopy, and the pain and functional recovery were evaluated by VAS score, ASES score, and active range of motion of shoulder joint at last follow-up; MRI was performed after operation, and the integrity of rotator cuff was evaluated by Sugaya classification system.

Results: All the 11 patients were followed up 2-22 months, with an average of 13.5 months. All incisions healed by first intention, and there was no complication such as infection, rotator cuff re-tear, and anchor falling off. At last follow-up, the VAS score was 0.8±0.7 and the ASES score was 93.5±4.2, which significantly improved when compared with those before operation ( P<0.05). All 11 patients had no significant swelling in the shoulders, and the active range of motion was (165.1±8.8)° in flexion, (75.3±8.4)° in abduction, (56.6±5.5)° in internal rotation, and (51.8±4.0)° in external rotation, which significantly improved when compared with those before operation ( P<0.05). Shoulder MRI showed adequate tendon thickness and good continuity in 9 cases, including 4 cases with partial high signal area; and 2 cases with inadequate tendon thickness but high continuity and partial high signal area. According to Sugaya classification system, there were 4 cases of type 1 (36.4%), 5 cases of type 2 (45.5%), and 2 cases of type 3 (18.1%).

Conclusion: For the patients with primary tear in medial enthesis of rotator cuff, the "tail compression fixation+suture bridge" technology under shoulder arthroscopy is simple and effective.

目的: 探讨肩关节镜下“尾端下压固定+桥式缝合”技术治疗原发性肩袖止点区内侧撕裂的可行性与临床疗效。.

方法: 回顾性分析2020年10月—2022年10月收治的11例符合选择标准的原发性肩袖止点区内侧撕裂患者临床资料,男3例,女8例;年龄39~79岁,平均61.0岁。8例因跌倒致肩袖损伤,受伤至入院时间1~4个月,平均2.0个月;余3例无明显诱因。肩关节主动活动均受限,患肩主动活动度前屈(64.1±10.9)°、外展(78.1±6.4)°、内旋(48.2±6.6)°、外旋(41.8±10.5)°;其中5例出现肩关节僵硬症状。术前疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)为(7.8±0.8)分,美国肩肘外科医师协会(ASES)评分为(23.9±6.4)分。采用肩关节镜下“尾端下压固定+桥式缝合”技术治疗,末次随访时采用VAS评分、ASES评分及肩关节主动活动度评价疼痛和功能恢复情况;术后行MRI检查,通过Sugaya分类系统评估肩袖完整性。.

结果: 术后11例患者均获随访,随访时间2~22个月,平均13.5个月。患者切口均Ⅰ期愈合,均未出现感染、肩袖再次撕裂以及锚钉脱落等并发症。末次随访时,VAS评分为(0.8±0.7)分,ASES评分为(93.5±4.2)分,均较术前明显改善( P<0.05)。11例患者肩部均无明显肿胀,肩关节主动活动度分别为前屈(165.1±8.8)°、外展(75.3±8.4)°、内旋(56.6±5.5)°、外旋(51.8±4.0)°,较术前明显改善( P<0.05)。肩关节MRI检查示9例患者肌腱厚度足够,连续性良好,其中4例提示部分高信号区域;2例肌腱厚度不足,但连续性较高,并且合并部分高信号区域。根据Sugaya分类系统评估,1型4例(36.4%)、2型5例(45.5%)、3型2例(18.1%)。.

结论: 针对原发性肩袖止点区内侧撕裂患者,采用肩关节镜下“尾端下压固定+桥式缝合”技术治疗操作简便,临床疗效可靠。.

Keywords: Rotator cuff injury; arthroscopy; suture bridge; tail compression fixation; tear in medial enthesis of rotator cuff.

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Arthroscopy
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Range of Motion, Articular
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Rotator Cuff / surgery
  • Rotator Cuff Injuries* / surgery
  • Rupture
  • Shoulder
  • Shoulder Joint* / surgery
  • Sutures
  • Treatment Outcome

Grants and funding

国家自然科学基金资助项目(81972124、82202755)