Dalbavancin vs standard of care for Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in patients unable to receive outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy

Abstract

Background: This study compared dalbavancin with standard of care (SOC) for patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) who were unable to receive outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT).

Methods: This retrospective cohort compared re-admission rates related to the index infection between patients treated with dalbavancin or SOC for SAB. Patients aged ≥18 years seen by the infectious diseases consult service who had received at least one dose of dalbavancin or at least 1 week of SOC parenteral antibacterials as directed therapy for SAB at the time of discharge were included. The SOC group consisted of patients transferred from the main hospital to one of the post-acute care facilities to complete parenteral antibacterials. The primary outcome was re-admission rate within 30 days of completion of therapy. Secondary outcomes included re-admission rate within 90 days of completion of therapy and adherence to the antibacterial regimen.

Results: Twenty-seven patients received dalbavancin and 27 patients received SOC. Baseline demographics were comparable between groups, although more patients in the SOC group had indwelling prostheses or hardware (4% vs 22%). The majority of SAB was caused by methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (56% vs 59%). Re-admission rates for the dalbavancin group were similar to those for the SOC group within 30 days (15% vs 22%; P=0.484) and 90 days (19% vs 22%; P=0.735) of completion of therapy. Adherence to the antibacterial regimen was significantly higher among patients treated with dalbavancin compared with SOC (85% vs 44%; P<0.001).

Conclusions: Dalbavancin offers similar clinical outcomes to SOC for patients with SAB who are unable to receive OPAT.

Keywords: Dalbavancin; Oritavancin; Patient re-admission; Staphylococcus aureus; Substance abuse; Vancomycin.