Background: Virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) are emerging treatment modalities in psychiatry, which are capable of producing clinical outcomes broadly comparable to those achieved with standard psychotherapies.
Objective: Because the side effect profile associated with the clinical use of VR and AR remains largely unknown, we systematically reviewed available evidence of their adverse effects.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) framework across 3 mental health databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, and Embase) to identify VR and AR interventions targeting mental health diagnoses.
Results: Of 73 studies meeting the inclusion criteria, 7 reported worsening clinical symptoms or an increased fall risk. Another 21 studies reported "no adverse effects" but failed to identify obvious adverse effects, mainly cybersickness, documented in their results. More concerningly, 45 of the 73 studies made no mention of adverse effects whatsoever.
Conclusions: An appropriate screening tool would help ensure that VR adverse effects are correctly identified and reported.
Keywords: AR; VR; adverse events; augmented reality; cybersickness; hardware; mental health; reporting standards; side effects; software; virtual reality.
©Robert M Lundin, Yuhern Yeap, David B Menkes. Originally published in JMIR Mental Health (https://mental.jmir.org), 05.05.2023.