A pragmatic evaluation of university student experience of remote digital learning during the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on lessons learned for future practice

PLoS One. 2023 May 4;18(5):e0283742. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283742. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic and subsequent national lockdowns resulted in drastic changes to the way that higher education was delivered. A mixed-methods research study was conducted to explore university students' perceptions of online learning during the 2020/21 academic year. Students from across all Welsh higher education institutions were invited to participate. First, a series of focus groups (n = 13) were conducted to explore students' experiences of online learning during the pandemic. Two were conducted in Welsh, the remaining eleven in English. Thematic analysis led researchers to develop eight key themes: Seeking the positives, Facilitators to learning, Barriers to learning, Lost sense of community, Let down by University, Workload, Assessment, and Health and well-being. These themes informed the design of a quantitative survey which was completed by 759 students. It was found that students were largely satisfied with the quality of online learning, however there were specific challenges associated with a lack of community, wellbeing concerns, and challenges with loneliness and isolation. Data from the focus groups and survey informed recommendations for practice in three key categories; teaching practice, institutional level recommendations, and student health and wellbeing considerations.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • COVID-19* / epidemiology
  • Communicable Disease Control
  • Humans
  • Pandemics*
  • Students
  • Universities

Grants and funding

The research was funded by a Higher Education Funding Council for Wales, Higher Education Investment and Recovery Fund (W21/08HE) project to establish a Universities Wales Learning and Teaching Network (LTN). The LTN then awarded funds to PMN to complete the project. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.