Three-dimensional (3D) printing is a rapidly evolving field and has gained increasing importance in the medical sector. However, the increasing usage of printing materials is accompanied by more wastages. With a rising awareness of the environmental impact of the medical sector, the development of highly accurate and biodegradable materials is of great interest. This study aims to compare the accuracy of polylactide/polyhydroxyalkanoate (PLA/PHA) surgical guides printed by fused filament fabrication and material jetted guides of MED610 in fully guided dental implant placement before and after steam sterilization. Five guides were tested in this study and each was either printed with PLA/PHA or MED610 and either steam-sterilized or not. After implant insertion in a 3D-printed upper jaw model, the divergence between planned and achieved implant position was calculated by digital superimposition. Angular deviation and 3D deviation at the base and the apex were determined. Non-sterilized PLA/PHA guides showed an angle deviation of 0.38 ± 0.53° compared to 2.88 ± 0.75° in sterile guides (P > 0.001), an offset of 0.49 ± 0.21 mm and 0.94 ± 0.23 mm (P < 0.05), and an offset at the apex of 0.50 ± 0.23 mm before and 1.04 ± 0.19 mm after steam sterilization (P < 0.025). No statistically significant difference could be shown for angle deviation or 3D offset at both locations for guides printed with MED610. PLA/PHA printing material showed significant deviations in angle and 3D accuracy after sterilization. However, the reached accuracy level is comparable to levels reached with materials already used in clinical routine and therefore, PLA/PHA surgical guide is a convenient and green alternative.
Keywords: Dental implants; Fused filament fabrication; Polyhydroxyalkanoate; Polylactide; Surgical guide; Three-dimensional printing.
Copyright: © 2022 Author(s).