Optimizing internal biosecurity on pig farms by assessing movements of farm staff

Elise Bernaerdt; Inmaculada Díaz; Carlos Piñeiro; Miquel Collell; Jeroen Dewulf; Dominiek Maes

doi:10.1186/s40813-023-00310-4

Optimizing internal biosecurity on pig farms by assessing movements of farm staff

Porcine Health Manag. 2023 Apr 15;9(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40813-023-00310-4.

Authors

Elise Bernaerdt¹, Inmaculada Díaz², Carlos Piñeiro², Miquel Collell³, Jeroen Dewulf⁴, Dominiek Maes⁵

Affiliations

¹ Unit of Porcine Health Management, Department of Internal Medicine, Reproduction, and Population Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium. elise.bernaerdt@ugent.be.
² PigCHAMP Pro Europa, C. Dámaso Alonso 14, 40006, Segovia, Spain.
³ MSD Animal Health, C. de Josefa Valcárel 38, 28027, Madrid, Spain.
⁴ Veterinary Epidemiology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Reproduction, and Population Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium.
⁵ Unit of Porcine Health Management, Department of Internal Medicine, Reproduction, and Population Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium.

Abstract

For internal biosecurity, it is important to separate different age groups in a pig farm and to stick to specific working lines when visiting the barns. Currently, there is no research on the movements of farm staff on pig farms. The objectives of this observational study were to assess movements of farm staff on pig farms, to assess risky movements and to investigate whether movements differ according to time (week of the batch farrowing system (BFS) and weekday vs. weekend) and unit (farrowing, gestation/insemination, nursery, and fattening unit). Five commercial sow farms participated and on each farm, an internal movement monitoring system was installed. Detection points were installed throughout the farm and workers had to wear a personal beacon. Movement data were collected from 1 December 2019 until 30 November 2020. The following sequence of movements was considered as safe: (1) dressing room, (2) farrowing, (3) gestation/insemination, (4) nursery, (5) fattening, (6) quarantine, and (7) cadaver storage. Movements in the opposite direction were considered as risk, unless a dressing room was visited in between. The total number of movements differed according to week of the BFS, and was highest in insemination and farrowing week. The percentage of risky movements was influenced by week of the BFS for two farms, and was highest around weaning. The percentage of risky movements varied between farms and ranged from 9 to 38%. There were more movements on a weekday compared to a weekend day. There were more movements towards the farrowing and gestation/insemination unit in insemination and farrowing week compared to other weeks of the BFS, but week of the BFS had no impact on movements towards nursery and fattening unit. This study showed that there were a lot of (risky) movements on pig farms and that these movements varied according to week of the BFS, day of the week, and unit. This study creates awareness, which could be a first step in optimizing working lines. Future research should focus on why certain risky movements occur and how these can be avoided to achieve better biosecurity and higher health status on farms.

Keywords: Farm staff movements; Internal biosecurity; Pig production; Working lines.