Quality of systematic reviews on timing of complementary feeding for early childhood allergy prevention

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Apr 4;23(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-01899-4.

Abstract

Background: Only rigorously prepared analyses can provide the highest level of evidence to inform decision-making. Several recent systematic reviews (SRs) examined the hypothesis that the early introduction of specific allergenic complementary foods (CFs) to infants may lead to a lower incidence of one or more allergic outcomes. However, the methodological rigour and quality of reporting of SRs in this area has not yet been systematically evaluated.

Methods: We comprehensively searched PubMed, Medline (Ovid), and Web of Science Core Collection on 13th January 2022, using a pre-specified and tested search syntax for SRs with RCT evidence on the early introduction of allergenic CFs as a means for allergy prevention in infants and children. We examined the quality and risk of bias (RoB) using AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS tools, examined adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for SRs and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), and checked whether certainty of the evidence was assessed.

Results: Twelve SRs were included. Application of both tools resulted in similar overall judgements in terms of direction and extent for nine of the 12 SRs. Nine SRs were found to be of critically low to low quality according to AMSTAR-2 and to be at high RoB according to ROBIS. One SR received a moderate quality rating (AMSTAR-2) and high RoB rating (ROBIS). However, for two SRs, judgements between AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS were at stark variance. Only two SRs fully adhered to the PRISMA checklist. Six SRs evaluated the certainty of the body of RCT evidence. Several SRs failed to consider unpublished studies either by an explicit a priori exclusion or by inadequate search strategies.

Conclusions: Well-conducted SRs are important for decision-making and informing guideline development, the quality of their methodology should therefore be considered. The methodological rigour and the reporting quality of SRs on the timing of CF for allergy prevention must be improved.

Registration: https://osf.io/7cs4b .

Keywords: Allergy prevention; Complementary feeding; Methodological quality; Risk of bias; Systematic review.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Bias
  • Checklist
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Humans
  • Hypersensitivity* / prevention & control
  • Infant
  • Infant Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
  • Research Design*
  • Systematic Reviews as Topic