Purpose of review: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is estimated to account for over 60% of heart failure (HF) patients and is associated with worse outcomes than a non-ischemic etiology. In patients with ischemic HF, myocardial revascularization has multiple mechanisms of action based on the concept that blood flow restoration of viable but underperfused myocardium might reverse the hibernation of the left ventricle and prevent future spontaneous myocardial infarction, which could potentially improve patients' outcomes. Here, we aim to elaborate on indications, timing, type, and impact of completeness of revascularization in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and ischemic etiology.
Recent findings: For decades, coronary artery bypass graft surgery has been the pilar of revascularization in patents with multivessel CAD and reduced EF. Recent development in the interventional field led to overall increase of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) adoption in treatment of ischemic HFrEF. However, recently published randomized study demonstrated no added benefit of PCI over optimal medical therapy in patients with severe ischemic cardiomyopathy challenging the beneficial role of revascularization in this setting. Since the decision on revascularization in ischemic cardiomyopathy frequently cannot be made based strictly on guidelines, tailored treatment strategy should be mandated with the essential role of multidisciplinary approach. These decisions should be based on capability to achieve complete revascularization, with the consideration that in certain situations it may not be accomplished.
Keywords: Coronary artery bypass grafting; Coronary artery disease; Heart failure; Percutaneous coronary intervention.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.