Direct and indirect effects of agricultural land cover on avian biodiversity in eastern Canada

Michelle Rabbetts; Lenore Fahrig; Greg W Mitchell; Kevin C Hannah; Sara J Collins; Scott Wilson

doi:10.1007/s10531-023-02559-1

Direct and indirect effects of agricultural land cover on avian biodiversity in eastern Canada

Biodivers Conserv. 2023;32(4):1403-1421. doi: 10.1007/s10531-023-02559-1. Epub 2023 Mar 4.

Authors

Michelle Rabbetts¹, Lenore Fahrig¹, Greg W Mitchell^{1

2}, Kevin C Hannah³, Sara J Collins¹, Scott Wilson^{1

4

5}

Affiliations

¹ Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.
² Wildlife Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Ottawa, ON Canada.
³ Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Ottawa, ON Canada.
⁴ Department of Forest and Conservation Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada.
⁵ Wildlife Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Delta, BC Canada.

Abstract

Agriculture is one of the largest threats to global biodiversity. However, most studies have focused only on the direct effects of agriculture on biodiversity, and few have addressed the indirect effects, potentially over or under-estimating the overall impacts of agriculture on biodiversity. The indirect effect is the response not to the agricultural cover types or operations per se, but instead, to the way that agriculture influences the extent and configuration of different types of natural land cover in the landscape. We used structural equation modelling (SEM) to evaluate the direct, indirect, and total effects of agriculture on species richness of three bird guilds: forest birds, shrub-edge birds, and open country birds. We found that forest bird richness was driven by the negative indirect effect of cropland via forest loss. Shrub-edge and open country bird richness increased with the amount of agriculture land covers; however, importantly, we found negative indirect effects of agriculture on both guilds via a reduction in more natural land covers. This latter result highlights how we would have over-estimated the positive effects of agriculture on shrub-edge and open country bird richness had we not measured both direct and indirect effects (i.e., the total effect size is less than the direct effect size). Overall, our results suggest that a bird-friendly agricultural landscape in our region would have forest that is configured to maximize forest edge, and a high proportion of perennial forage within the agricultural portion of the landscape.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10531-023-02559-1.

Keywords: Agricultural expansion; Bird; Forest loss; Species richness; Structural equation modeling.

© The Author(s) 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.