Development and In Vitro/In Vivo Comparative Characterization of Cryopreserved and Decellularized Tracheal Grafts

Cells. 2023 Mar 13;12(6):888. doi: 10.3390/cells12060888.

Abstract

Tracheal reconstruction represents a challenge when primary anastomosis is not feasible. Within this scenario, the study aim was to develop a new pig-derived decellularized trachea (DecellT) to be compared with the cryopreserved counterpart (CryoT) for a close predictive analysis. Tracheal segments underwent decellularization by a physical + enzymatic + chemical method (12 cycles); in parallel, cryopreserved samples were also prepared. Once decellularized (histology/DNA quantification), the two groups were characterized for Alpha-Gal epitopes/structural proteins (immunohistochemistry/histology/biochemical assays/second harmonic generation microscopy)/ultrastructure (Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM))/mechanical behaviour. Cytotoxicity absence was assessed in vitro (extract-test assay/direct seeding, HM1SV40 cell line) while biocompatibility was verified in BALB/c mice, followed by histological/immunohistochemical analyses and SEM (14 days). Decellularization effectively removed Alpha-Gal epitopes; cartilage histoarchitecture was retained in both groups, showing chondrocytes only in the CryoT. Cryopreservation maintained few respiratory epithelium sparse cilia, not detectable in DecellT. Focusing on ECM, preserved structural/ultrastructural organization and collagen content were observed in the cartilage of both; conversely, the GAGs were significantly reduced in DecellT, as confirmed by mechanical study results. No cytotoxicity was highlighted by CryoT/DecellT in vitro, as they were also corroborated by a biocompatibility assay. Despite some limitations (cells presence/GAGs reduction), CryoT/DecellT are both appealing options, which warrant further investigation in comparative in vivo studies.

Keywords: cryopreservation; decellularization; immunogenicity; respiratory epithelium; tissue engineering; trachea; tracheal cartilage.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Collagen / metabolism
  • Cryopreservation / methods
  • Extracellular Matrix / metabolism
  • Mice
  • Swine
  • Tissue Engineering* / methods
  • Tissue Scaffolds*

Substances

  • Collagen

Grants and funding

This research was funded by the ‘Consorzio per la Ricerca Sanitaria’ (CORIS) of the Veneto Region, Italy (L.i.f.e.L.a.b. Program), grant number DGR1017, 17 July 2018.