The role of supporting and disruptive mechanisms of FT3 homeostasis in regulating the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis

Rudolf Hoermann; Mark J Pekker; John E M Midgley; Johannes W Dietrich

doi:10.1177/20420188231158163

The role of supporting and disruptive mechanisms of FT3 homeostasis in regulating the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis

Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Mar 14:14:20420188231158163. doi: 10.1177/20420188231158163. eCollection 2023.

Authors

Rudolf Hoermann¹, Mark J Pekker², John E M Midgley³, Johannes W Dietrich^{4

5

6

7}

Affiliations

¹ Department for Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Lüdenscheid, 113 Andersons Road, Yandina QLD 4561, Australia.
² Mathematical Sciences Department, University of Alabama, Huntsville, AL, USA.
³ North Lakes Clinical, Ilkley, UK.
⁴ Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism Section, Department of Medicine I, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Hospitals, Bochum, Germany.
⁵ Diabetes Centre Bochum/Hattingen, Blankenstein Hospital, Hattingen, Germany.
⁶ Centre for Diabetes Technology (ZDT), Catholic Hospitals Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
⁷ Centre for Rare Endocrine Diseases (ZSEK), Ruhr Center for Rare Diseases (CeSER), Ruhr University of Bochum and Witten/Herdecke University, Bochum, Germany.

Abstract

Background: Thyroid hormones are controlled by the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid (HPT) axis through a complex network of regulatory loops, involving the hormones TRH, TSH, FT4, and FT3. The relationship between TSH and FT4 is widely used for diagnosing thyroid diseases. However, mechanisms of FT3 homeostasis are not well understood.

Objective: We used mathematical modelling to further examine mechanisms that exist in the HPT axis regulation for protecting circulating FT3 levels.

Methods: A mathematical model consisting of a system of four coupled first-order parameterized non-linear ordinary differential equations (ODEs) was developed, accounting for the interdependencies between the hormones in the HPT axis regulation. While TRH and TSH feed forward to the pituitary and thyroid, respectively, FT4 and FT3 feed backward to both the pituitary and hypothalamus. Stable equilibrium solutions of the ODE system express homeostasis for a particular variable, such as FT3, if this variable stays in a narrow range while certain other parameter(s) and system variable(s) may vary substantially.

Results: The model predicts that (1) TSH-feedforward protects FT3 levels if the FT4 production rate declines and (2) combined negative feedback by FT4 and FT3 on both TSH and TRH production rates keeps FT3 levels insensitive to moderate changes in FT4 production rates and FT4 levels. The optimum FT4 and FT3 feedback and TRH and TSH-feedforward ranges that preserve FT3 homeostasis were found by numerical continuation analysis. Model predictions were in close agreement with clinical studies and individual patient examples of hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism.

Conclusions: These findings further extend the concept of HPT axis regulation beyond TSH and FT4 to integrate the more active sister hormone FT3 and mechanisms of FT3 homeostasis. Disruption of homeostatic mechanisms leads to disease. This provides a perspective for novel testable concepts in clinical studies to therapeutically target the disruptive mechanisms.

Keywords: HPT axis; homeostasis; hypothalamic–pituitary–thyroid regulation; mathematical model; tri-iodothyronine.