Efficacy of ANTHRASIL (Anthrax Immune Globulin Intravenous (Human)) in rabbit and nonhuman primate models of inhalational anthrax: Data supporting approval under animal rule

PLoS One. 2023 Mar 17;18(3):e0283164. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283164. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

To meet the requirements of the Animal Rule, the efficacy of monotherapy with ANTHRASIL® (Anthrax Immune Globulin Intravenous (Human)) for inhalational anthrax was evaluated in blinded studies using rabbit and nonhuman primate models. Animals in both studies were randomized to treatment groups exposed to ~ 200 LD50 Bacillus anthracis (Ames strain) spores by the aerosol route to induce inhalational anthrax. Rabbits (N = 50/group) were treated with either 15 U/kg ANTHRASIL or a volume-matching dose of IGIV after disease onset as determined by the detection of bacterial toxin in the blood. At the end of the study, survival rates were 2% (1 of 48) in the IGIV control group, and 26% (13 of 50) in the ANTHRASIL-treated group (p = 0.0009). Similarly, ANTHRASIL was effective in cynomolgus monkeys (N = 16/group) when administered therapeutically after the onset of toxemia, with 6% survival in the IGIV control and a dose-related increase in survival of 36%, 43%, and 70% with 7.5, 15 or 30 U/kg doses of ANTHRASIL, respectively. These studies formed the basis for approval of ANTHRASIL by FDA under the Animal Rule.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Anthrax* / microbiology
  • Antigens, Bacterial
  • Bacillus anthracis*
  • Disease Models, Animal
  • Humans
  • Immunoglobulin G / pharmacology
  • Primates
  • Rabbits

Substances

  • Anthrax Immune Globulin Intravenous
  • Immunoglobulin G
  • Antigens, Bacterial

Supplementary concepts

  • Inhalation anthrax

Grants and funding

This work was funded by the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) under contract HHSO100200500007C. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.