The influence of printing angle on color and translucency of 3D printed resins for dental restorations

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the influence of printing orientation on color and translucency of 3D printing restorative resins.

Methods: Four 3D printing resin systems in the available shades (DFT-Detax Freeprint Temp- A1, A2,A3; FP-Formlabs Permanent Crown- A2,A3,B1,C2; FT- Formlabs Temporary CB- A2,A3,B1,C2; GCT-GC Temporary- Light, Medium) were evaluated. Three samples (10×10×1.2 mm) from each material were printed at two different printing orientations (0° and 90°) and polished to 1.00 ± 0,01 mm of thickness. Spectral reflectance was measured against black background using a calibrated spectroradiometer, CIE D65 standard illuminant and the 45°/0°geometry. Color and translucency differences were evaluated using CIEDE2000 metric (ΔE₀₀) and 50:50% perceptibility (PT₀₀ and TPT₀₀) and acceptability (AT₀₀ and TAT₀₀) thresholds.

Results: In general, color changes due to printing orientation at (0° and 90°) were mainly produced by ΔL* or ΔC* . ΔE₀₀ were above PT₀₀ for all DFT shades, FP-B1, FP-C2, FT-A2 and FT-B1. Only for DFT-1, ΔE₀₀ was above AT₀₀. ΔRTP₀₀ values were above TPT₀₀ for DFT-A1, DFT-A3, FP-B1 and FT-B1, but lower than TAT₀₀. The direction of the changes in translucency (ΔRTP₀₀) depends on the material and shade.

Significance: The selection of building orientation (0° and 90°) for the 3D printed resins influence the visual color and translucency and therefore their esthetic appearance. These aspects should be considered when printing dental restorations using the evaluated materials.

Keywords: 3D printing resin; Additive manufacturing; CIEDE2000 metric; Color; Printing angle; Provisional restoration; Translucency parameter.