Tracheostomy insertion in COVID-19: insertion practice and factors leading to unplanned tube exchange

Peter McCauley; Amr Mohammed; Michelle Casey; Eslam Ramadan; Sinéad Galvin; James Paul O'Neill; Gerard Curley; Imran Sulaiman; Michael Emmet O'Brien; James O'Rourke

doi:10.21037/jtd-22-896

Tracheostomy insertion in COVID-19: insertion practice and factors leading to unplanned tube exchange

J Thorac Dis. 2023 Feb 28;15(2):410-422. doi: 10.21037/jtd-22-896. Epub 2023 Feb 7.

Affiliations

¹ Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
² Department of Respiratory Medicine, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
³ Department of Ear, Nose and Throat Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Abstract

Background: Tracheostomy insertion in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) presents unique challenges. Patients frequently have high ventilatory requirements, and as an aerosol generating procedure, tracheostomy insertion creates the potential for staff transmission. Problems with tracheostomies contribute to morbidity and mortality, and tracheostomy changes may increase risks of staff transmission. We sought to quantify the incidence of clinically necessitated tracheostomy changes, establish the indications for change and investigate the incidence of staff transmission.

Methods: We conducted a single institution, retrospective, observational cohort study of all intensive care unit (ICU) patients with COVID-19 who had a tracheostomy between March 2020 and April 2021. The institution is a large tertiary referral centre in Ireland.

Results: Forty-three patients had a tracheostomy during the study period. All were a Shiley™ Flexible Adult Taperguard or Shiley™ XLT Tracheostomy. 14 patients (33%) required a tracheostomy change, with the majority (57%) involving a change from a standard size to an extended length tracheostomy. Persistent leak was the most common indication for change (71.6%). Other indications included patient-ventilator dyssynchrony, persistent cough and accidental decannulation. No staff transmission of COVID-19 occurred during this study.

Conclusions: The incidence of tracheostomy change was 33%, highlighting the importance of selecting the right tracheostomy for each patient. We discuss how key characteristics of tracheostomies such as type, size, length and inner diameter may impact flow, resistance and work of breathing, leading to unplanned tracheostomy change. No staff transmission occurred arising from tracheostomy insertion, adding to increasing evidence that tracheostomy insertion in COVID-19 appears safe with adherence to guidelines describing the correct use of personal protective equipment.

Keywords: Tracheostomy; coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); invasive mechanical ventilation; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) aerosol-generating procedures.