The impact of semen parameters on ICSI and pregnancy outcomes in egg recipient cycles with PGT-A

Andrology. 2023 Oct;11(7):1326-1336. doi: 10.1111/andr.13415. Epub 2023 Mar 14.

Abstract

Background: The egg donation model offers an opportunity to isolate the male factor and evaluate its impact on IVF-intracytoplasmic sperm injection and pregnancy outcomes.

Objective: To study the effect of non-obstructive azoospermia on intracytoplasmic sperm injection and pregnancy outcomes compared with severe oligozoospermia and mild-to-moderate oligozoospermia in egg recipient cycles.

Materials and methods: This is a retrospective longitudinal cohort study, including 1594 patients who underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection in egg recipient cycles with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies. The cohort was divided into three groups: couples with non-obstructive azoospermia accounting for 479 patients (30%); couples with severe oligozoospermia (sperm number <5 × 106 /mL), accounting for 442 patients (27.8%); couples with mild-to-moderate oligozoospermia, with sperm number >5 × 106 and <15 × 106 /mL, accounting for 673 patients (42.2%).

Results: The fertilisation rate was significantly reduced in the non-obstructive azoospermia group as compared with the severe oligozoospermia and the mild-to-moderate oligozoospermia group: 30.3% versus 63% and 77.3% (p < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis adjusted for confounders highlighted non-obstructive azoospermia as a negative predictor of obtaining a euploid blastocyst both per injected oocyte and per obtained blastocyst. The miscarriage rate in the non-obstructive azoospermia group was 11.8%; higher than the severe oligozoospermia and mild-to-moderate oligozoospermia groups (7% and 2.7%) (p < 0.05). The live birth rate per embryo transfer (ET) was significantly lower in the non-obstructive azoospermia group compared with the severe oligozoospermia and the mild-to-moderate oligozoospermia group (20.4% vs. 30.3% and 35.4%, p < 0.05). The risk of preterm labour was significantly higher in the non-obstructive azoospermia group, compared with the severe oligozoospermia and mild-to-moderate oligozoospermia group (55.1% vs. 46.8% and 16.1%, p < 0.001), and this difference was observed in both singleton and twin pregnancies.

Discussion and conclusion: In our retrospective comparative study, non-obstructive azoospermia significantly affects early embryonic potential and live birth rates per cycle and per embryo transfer. It is also associated with higher risk of preterm birth. Future prospective multi-centre studies are needed to highlight the effect of sperm quality on ART and pregnancy outcomes.

Keywords: ICSI outcomes; PGT-A; azoospermia; donor cycles; pregnancy outcomes.

MeSH terms

  • Azoospermia* / therapy
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Male
  • Oligospermia*
  • Pregnancy
  • Pregnancy Outcome
  • Pregnancy Rate
  • Premature Birth*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Semen
  • Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic